"Listen to me! Please listen! If you don't, if you won't, if you fail to understand, then the same incredible terror that's menacing me WILL STRIKE AT YOU!"Forget about Obama and the Canadian Embassy, The Washington Post, apparently, huddled with Monty Pythons' "Ministry of Silly Walks" and rocketed backwards, from their their Woman-Bashing Op-Ed of Sunday.
The Washington Post’s failed effort at satire?
“If it insulted people, that was not the intent,” Outlook editor John Pomfret told me this morning, calling the piece “tongue-in-cheek.” […]
Pomfret said that being an opinion article, he’s not surprised readers reacted to it strongly. But added: “Perhaps it wasn’t packaged well enough to make it clear that it was tongue-in-cheek.”
Even if intended as a joke, the Allen piece clearly isn’t the best way for the Post to achieve its goal of bringing in more women readers, and it remains to be seen if the fallout continues today.
They even changed the headline!
And WaPo's Ombudsman isn't buying into it.
As The Garlic pointed out, this appeared to be a very sly, crafty collaboration, between the WaPo, Charlotte Allen and Hillary Clinton, to put out such an offensive Op-Ed, insulting and degrading woman, two-days before Little Super Tuesday, and look what happened;
Clinton revives campaign in Ohio, Texas
And, as we cautioned;
"And they come out with this, what do we want to call it, this Hillary Manifesto, at this late stage ... Yes, Allen and The Washington Post has thrown in their lot with the Freakshow ... They want a Hillary-McCain finale ... Their in league with McCain and the RNC ... So, how do you explain this;
And Hillary, seemingly, returning the favor;
Even the one of the Freakshow's biggest Freaks has questions, as do the exit polls.
Was this woman-bashing Op-Ed part of the Clinton Campaign's "Kitchen Sink" strategy?
If so, watch out ladies, there'll be more incoming ... Perhaps a new batch of 3AM Ads- something like 3:15AM and 3:30AM, just to keep the pressure on, to maintain the fear level just right ... To keep woman awake, sleepless, and getting angry about it
And then, WHAMO!, Hillary and her cohorts hit with another insulting piece, probably dissing woman, for not being able to trust a candidate who will allow them the luxury of a decent night's sleep.
Maybe, after all those years of railing against the "vast rightwing conspiracy", Hillary has decided to team up with it
Obama can't keep you safe ... Obama won't let you sleep ...
Watch out, all you people in Pennsylvania ...
Think of this post (and taking a liberty) as Kevin McCarthy, in the waning moments of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers"
"She's here already! You're next!!"
Monty Python - Ministry of Silly Walks
Media Matters: Despite paper's concern "about keeping women as newspaper readers," Wash. Post published essay calling women "kind of dim" and "the stupid sex"
Crooks and Liars: Why the Washington Post can’t satisfy their women (or, Tweety eat yer heart out!)
Jane Hamsher: “Tongue In Cheek?” Nice Try
Rachel Sklar: WaPo Writer Proves Own Thesis With Inane Op-Ed
Jeff Fecke: Don't You Angry Feminists Have a Sense of Humor?